5 Points About ISO 20022

ISO 20022 is an international standard for financial messaging that provides a common platform for the exchange of electronic financial messages between financial institutions and other organizations.

It was developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and is maintained by the ISO Technical Committee TC68 Financial Services. ISO 20022 provides a flexible and extensible format for financial messages, which allows for the efficient exchange of financial data between different systems and platforms. It is widely adopted in the financial services industry, including in areas such as payments, securities, and foreign exchange.

ISO 20022 helps financial firms in several ways:

  1. Standardization: It provides a common format for financial messages, which allows for the efficient exchange of financial data between different systems and platforms. This standardization helps reduce errors, lower costs, and improve efficiency in financial transactions.
  2. Interoperability: ISO 20022 enables financial institutions to communicate with each other, regardless of the systems they use. This improves the ability of financial firms to participate in global financial markets and to offer their services to a wider range of customers.
  3. Straight-through-processing: The use of ISO 20022 enables the automation of financial transactions, by providing a common language for different systems to communicate with each other. This can help reduce errors and costs associated with manual processing.
  4. Rich data: ISO 20022 provides a rich set of data elements that can be used to convey financial information, allowing for more detailed and accurate financial messaging.
  5. Innovation: ISO 20022 enables new financial services to be developed, by providing a common format for the exchange of financial messages. This allows for the development of new financial products, such as mobile payments, and services, such as real-time gross settlement systems.

Overall, ISO 20022 helps financial firms to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and increase their ability to participate in global financial markets.

Best,

Rand

I am not a financial advisor. Perform your own research before making any investment. You are responsible for your choices 🙂

#ISO20022 #DigitalCurrency #Cryptocurrency #Fintech #money

How Fast is Money?

This will be a short one and really a question, at that. How fast is money? Why does that matter? What does it mean if it moves faster?

Money is an interesting idea. I think we can agree to that when we really stop and think about it. Over the centuries, it has taken on many forms: minted currencies, animal hides, jewelry, gold and silver, to good old “faith and credit.” It really boils down to a psychological acceptance of something that holds a value to receive something else in exchange.

That said, we believe in money. The United States has its dollar, the British kept their pound (says something about their feelings regarding the Euro), the Japanese have the Yen, and so on.

Money moves at a pace. Sometimes, longer than others. Likely for a reason that the average retail trader or average person doesn’t understand. It takes 3-5 business days for money to clear in a personal checking account. This is 2021 folks. We are purchasing tickets to fly Space X rockets and we have to wait 3-5 business days to get $100 in our checking account? I doubt the duration is the same for large institutions to move money from one to the other. Credit cards instantly record your spending, so why the delay in other applications? Money moves at different speeds.

Why does the speed of money movement matter? In the case of the retail end user, it matters the same as it does for the multi-national institution moving millions or billions of dollars. You want your money when you want it. The difference is, your $100 does not impact the economy the way $100 billion impacts the economy. We know that money can move at different speeds. It can post to your account instantly, but not clear immediately. It can be spent immediately at a store, or to pay a bill. It moves at different speeds when accounts are directly linked, you use a wire transfer, or deposit a paper check. Automation speeds up the movement of money. Digitalization facilitates faster than pen and paper.

If money moves faster, everything from your $100 check to a $100 billion transfer between banks, will effect global economies. If money, and I mean global money, in the realm of trillions in value can move and be utilized in seconds, rather than weeks, days, or even minutes, what kind of profound effect will that have? The United States has been issuing stimulus money over the course of the last year. (Disclosure: This is an exercise in the speed of moving money, not the politics of stimulus money.) We know that many people spend it as soon as it’s received. Reducing the time it takes to issue that money would effectively allow that money to be spent sooner, which in turn keeps money moving through the economy earlier than it did. This could be a game changer for a business that may close its doors if not enough customers came through their doors, or a mortgage payment was delayed because someone lost their job and was a month away from foreclosure.

All that said, if global money moved faster across all spectrums, what problems would that solve? How much does liquidity impact the different people, both linear and vertical in terms of value, across the financial spectrum? Does reducing the time it takes to move money from days or weeks to a matter of seconds mean something to you? I believe it does.

One such proponent of increasing liquidity is currently in a legal battle with the SEC. the outcome may be telling of which way finance is headed.

– Rand

All opinions are my own and should not be considered investment advice. I am doing this to provide entertainment.

Tweet = Control = Bitcoin Control?

Tweets from business leaders like Elon Musk reshape the landscape of assets like bitcoin in a matter of minutes. Be mindful, though. Elon is in the business of sustainable energy and mining bitcoin consumes massive amounts of energy.

Musk bought $1.5 billion worth of bitcoin only a short time before expressing that Tesla will no longer accept bitcoin for payment, pushing the price of bitcoin downward. If bitcoin mining operations in China were crippled by substantially lower the value of the cryptocurrency, it could pave the way for renewable energy companies like Tesla, controlled by Musk, to bring the operation to the United States.

Bitcoin miners need to have the asset at certain levels in order for the operation to be profitable, at least to break even. Each time bitcoin halves (May 2020), the value of the coin needs to appreciate in value for the operation to remain financially viable.

Gaining control in business sometimes requires making it no longer financially viable for a competitor to perform business operations. Digital assets is business, and big business at that. To give some perspective of where this decade old industry reaches today, we should include financial markets and institutions, energy, government regulators, consumers, and retail business across the globe. It is a world-wide part of the economy and to think it will not continue to progress is to be obtuse.

Musk, among other industry titans, have the opportunity to gain massive influence over the industry, and they know it. Post a “tweet” and sink the market? Effecting billions of dollars has never been so immediate. It also opens an opportunity to bring control of bitcoin mining operations to the United States amid a loosely defined regulatory period surrounding the cryptocurrency market.

Musk has a monumental opportunity to mine digital assets (those that require that activity) through renewable energy, rather than coal power currently deployed in other countries.

– Rand

All opinions are my own and should not be considered investment advice. I am doing this to provide entertainment.

#bitcoin #cryptocurrency #renewableenergy #elonmusk #bitcointweet #digitalasset

The Noise can be Distracting

Just over ten years since the creation of Bitcoin, we have one of the most controversial presidents of modern times blasting the existence of Bitcoin publicly. Why would the president of the United States take time to cast opinion on something “based on thin air?”

One can only assume that cryptocurrency has been gaining traction behind the scenes and if the general public has just been brought into the loop from a political standpoint, you can be certain that the big players have already made substantial stakes and plans in the future of cryptocurrency. The confusion is being brought to the future retail investors and there is no better way to that than to politicize an effort.

Understand that the value of the US dollar is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. It is no longer backed by physical gold. It is based on a form of psychological trust. This trust propels the economy and gets the honest person up in the morning to go out and make government backed money to support their living.

Honestly, it shows that if we really understood where the value of a dollar comes from, it should see magnificent swings in its value based on the majority party of any given election cycle, more so when a major change of party or leadership takes place.

Both the dollar and digital assets are based on trust in something. Albeit, one will not be hard pressed to find opposition of either asset class. Imagine the possibility of transferring trust from a politicized government backed currency to a system of checks and balances that resides on a global public ledger tracking all transactions without the ability to tamper. Take this notion even further and visualize a system of digital assets that improve and validate the flow of currency, real estate, contracts, goods and services globally in a regulatory framework that enhances transparency and accountability.

Let us see what October brings with various digital asset opportunities.

Best,

Rand

Words and opinions are my own. This is for entertainment purposes and to share my own opinions. This is not financial advice.

#digitalasset #cryptocurrency #digitalfuture

 

The bulls have it, the bears want it. Will crypto pull from a market correction?

The general feeling of continued market stability is coming under question. Some have proposed severe market downturns. The inevitable will happen, but when?

Whether you believe that someone has the crystal ball on market forecasting is entirely up to you. I am a student of history and history does repeat itself, though not entirely in the same manner or breadth each time, the overall cycle does come full-circle. I like to be prepared.

Will cryptocurrencies become a new hedge against market corrections? Will they replace, compete, or partner with precious metals and other traditional bear market safe havens?

As we near the decision of whether the SEC will permit Bitcoin ETFs (delayed until September 30, 2018), I believe that we will see a shift into this new asset class by large investors, banks, family trusts, and eventually, the individual investor. VanEck has proposed a $200k minimum to ensure that investors are in fact accredited and fractional shares will not be available.

Volatility will continue due to uncertainty in the news and various other sources about which cryptocurrencies will be the best bet in both the short and long term. For the up-to-date investor, that is anyone’s game. Regulatory frameworks are well under way, though likely out of sight to the average investor. As regulatory frameworks are developed, the landscape will change. Lobbyist groups, such as the Blockchain Association, are currently leading the charge across the political landscape representing companies like Coinbase, Polychain Capital, and others.

The end of Q3 and all of Q4 should have some very interesting action that I believe will give a little more perspective to the digital asset sphere. Particularly, the SEC review for the Blockchain ETFs and certain work in the blockchain/crypto sphere that is expected to go live, affecting the use of particular cryptocurrencies.

Best,

Rand

NOTE: As the domain name of this site suggests, the content my blog posts are opinion and not investment advice of any kind. Do your own research before making any decisions to invest (or not to invest). I am not a financial advisor. I am simply sharing information I gather from across the web, news, and media outlets and drawing my own possible conclusions.